On conversational valence and the definition of interjections

dc.contributor.authorLibert, Alan Reeden
dc.contributor.authorAustralian Linguistic Societyen_AU
dc.date.accessioned2012-09-26T04:57:41Z
dc.date.available2012-09-26T04:57:41Z
dc.date.created2012-10en_AU
dc.description.abstractInterjections, like some other word classes, have proven difficult to define in a principled way, and therefore there has been disagreement about whether some words belong to this class. Lists of interjections in grammars sometimes include arguably disparate items, e.g. greeting terms, along with words such as oh and ah. There has also been dispute about the possibility or necessity for interjections to be in a syntactic relation to other components, that is, about their valence. In this paper I propose a definition of interjection which involves an extension of valence in the usual syntactic sense, introducing the notion of conversational valence to distinguish between interjections and words such as goodbye. The latter can only be felicitously used when there is an addressee present, as well as the speaker, thus having a conversational valence of 2, while interjections do not require an addressee, i.e. their conversational valence is 1. For example, if I stub my toe I can appropriately say ouch! in the absence of anyone else. Interjections are distinguished by being the only linguistic items with such a low conversational valence.en_AU
dc.description.sponsorshipANU College of Arts & Social Sciences, School of Language Studies; ANU College of Asia and the Pacific, School of Culture, History and Languageen_AU
dc.format.extent15 pagesen_AU
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.citationLibert, A. R. (2012). On conversational valence and the definition of interjections. In M. Ponsonnet, L. Dao & M. Bowler (Eds), Proceedings of the 42nd Australian Linguistic Society Conference – 2011, Australian National University, Canberra ACT, 2-4 December 2011 (pp. 282-296).en_AU
dc.identifier.isbn978-0-9802815-4-5en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/9418
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.provenanceCopyright remains with the author. Permission has been given to deposit this paper and make it publicly available - emails from editor of proceedings, dated 30/08/12 and 8/10/12en_AU
dc.publisherAustralian Linguistic Societyen_AU
dc.relation.ispartofAustralian Linguistic Society Conferenceen_AU
dc.relation.ispartofseriesAustralian Linguistic Society Conference: 42nden_AU
dc.rightsAuthor/s retain copyrighten_AU
dc.sourceProceedings of the 42nd Australian Linguistic Society Conference 2011en_AU
dc.source.urihttp://langfest.anu.edu.au/index.php/als/als2011en_AU
dc.subjectinterjectionsen_AU
dc.subjectword classesen_AU
dc.subjectpragmaticsen_AU
dc.subjectvalenceen_AU
dc.subjectgreetingsen_AU
dc.titleOn conversational valence and the definition of interjectionsen_AU
dc.typeConference paperen_AU
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Access
local.contributor.affiliationLibert, Alan Reed, University of Newcastleen_AU
local.description.notesThe conference proceedings can be found at http://hdl.handle.net/1885/9404. "The 2011 Conference of the Australian Linguistic Society was ... hosted jointly by the School of Language Studies and the School of Culture, History and Language. The Conference convenors were Jane Simpson and Nicholas Evans" - from Proceedings, Editorial Noteen_AU
local.description.refereedYes
local.publisher.urlhttp://www.als.asn.auen_AU
local.type.statusPublished Versionen_AU

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Libert_OnConversational.2012.pdf
Size:
294.27 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
68 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: