Fire regimes of Australia

dc.contributor.authorMurphy, Brett P.en
dc.contributor.authorBradstock, Ross A.en
dc.contributor.authorBoer, Matthias M.en
dc.contributor.authorCarter, Johnen
dc.contributor.authorCary, Geoffrey J.en
dc.contributor.authorCochrane, Mark A.en
dc.contributor.authorFensham, Roderick J.en
dc.contributor.authorRussell-Smith, Jeremyen
dc.contributor.authorWilliamson, Grant J.en
dc.contributor.authorBowman, David M.J.S.en
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-17T00:34:05Z
dc.date.available2025-06-17T00:34:05Z
dc.date.issued2013-05-18en
dc.description.abstractAim Comparative analyses of fire regimes at large geographical scales can potentially identify ecological and climatic controls of fire. Here we describe Australia’s broad fire regimes, and explore interrelationships and trade-offs between fire regime components. We postulate that fire regime patterns will be governed by trade-offs between moisture, productivity, fire frequency and fire intensity. Location Australia. Methods We reclassified a vegetation map of Australia, defining classes based on typical fuel and fire types. Classes were intersected with a climate classification to derive a map of ‘fire regime niches’. Using expert elicitation and a literature search, we validated each niche and characterized typical and extreme fire intensities and return intervals. Satellite-derived active fire detections were used to determine seasonal patterns of fire activity. Results Fire regime characteristics are closely related to the latitudinal gradient in summer monsoon activity. Frequent low-intensity fires occur in the monsoonal north, and infrequent, high-intensity fires in the temperate south, demonstrating a trade-off between frequency and intensity: that is, very high-intensity fires are only associated with very low-frequency fire regimes in the high biomass eucalypt forests of southern Australia. While these forests occasionally experience extremely intense fires (> 50,000 kW m-1), such regimes are exceptional, with most of the continent dominated by grass fuels, typically burning with lower intensity (< 5000 kW m-1). Main conclusions Australia’s fire regimes exhibit a coherent pattern of frequent, grass-fuelled fires in many differing vegetation types. While eucalypts are a quintessential Australian entity, their contribution as a dominant driver of high-intensity fire regimes, via their litter and bark fuels, is restricted to the forests of the continent’s southern and eastern extremities. Our analysis suggests that the foremost driver of fire regimes at the continental scale is not productivity, as postulated conceptually, but the latitudinal gradient in summer monsoon rainfall activity.en
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by the Australian Centre for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis, a facility of the Australian Government-funded Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network (http://www.tern.org.au/), a research infrastructure facility established under the National Collaborative Research Infrastructure Strategy and Education Infrastructure Fund – Super Science Initiative, through the Department of Industry, Innovation, Science, Research and Tertiary Education. A NASA Interdisciplinary Sciences Grant (NNX11AB89G), awarded to M.A.C., D.M.J.S.B., B.P.M. and G.J.W, also supported the work.en
dc.description.statusPeer-revieweden
dc.format.extent11en
dc.identifier.otherScopus:85056577132en
dc.identifier.otherORCID:/0000-0002-6386-1751/work/162951391en
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056577132&partnerID=8YFLogxKen
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1885/733763889
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rightsPublisher Copyright: © 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.en
dc.sourceJournal of Biogeographyen
dc.subjectAustraliaen
dc.subjectClimateen
dc.subjectEcological disturbanceen
dc.subjectFire historyen
dc.subjectFire regimeen
dc.subjectPyrogeographyen
dc.subjectRemote sensingen
dc.subjectWildfireen
dc.titleFire regimes of Australiaen
dc.typeJournal articleen
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage1058en
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage1048en
local.contributor.affiliationMurphy, Brett P.; South Dakota State Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationBradstock, Ross A.; Fenner School of Environment & Society Special Projects, Fenner School of Environment & Society, ANU College of Systems and Society, The Australian National Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationBoer, Matthias M.; Western Sydney Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationCarter, John; School of History, Research School of Social Sciences, ANU College of Arts & Social Sciences, The Australian National Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationCary, Geoffrey J.; Fenner School of Environment & Society, ANU College of Systems and Society, The Australian National Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationCochrane, Mark A.; South Dakota State Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationFensham, Roderick J.; Queensland Department of Environment and Scienceen
local.contributor.affiliationRussell-Smith, Jeremy; Fenner School of Environment & Society Special Projects, Fenner School of Environment & Society, ANU College of Systems and Society, The Australian National Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationWilliamson, Grant J.; University of Tasmaniaen
local.contributor.affiliationBowman, David M.J.S.; Quantum Science, Department of Quantum Science & Technology, Research School of Physics, ANU College of Science and Medicine, The Australian National Universityen
local.identifier.citationvolume40en
local.identifier.doi10.1111/jbi.12065en
local.identifier.pure07106d45-6602-421d-87c2-c5706a54d2c9en
local.type.statusPublisheden

Downloads